Attachments
  • Mark as Completed
  • 16
  • More
Previous class
Section 3: Practical examples

Section 4: Safety boundaries

Module 8 — Agentic AI: When AI Starts Taking Actions

Section 4: Safety Boundaries

Purpose of This Section

This section defines the safety boundaries required when using agentic AI systems that can take actions rather than simply generate responses.

Agentic AI increases speed and power. Boundaries ensure control.

The Core Idea

When AI starts acting, responsibility does not disappear — it concentrates.

Agentic AI executes intent at scale. That makes clarity, permissioning, and oversight essential. Safety boundaries are not optional add-ons; they are core system requirements.

Core Safety Boundaries

Human-Defined Goals

Agentic AI does not decide objectives. Humans define goals, success criteria, and completion conditions.

Clear goals prevent agents from optimizing in unintended directions.

Human Approval of Actions

Meaningful actions must require explicit approval.

This includes sending communications, updating records, publishing content, or making changes to systems. Preparation can be automated; execution requires consent.

Override and Stop Authority

Agentic systems must be interruptible.

Humans must be able to pause, stop, or redirect agents immediately if outputs feel incorrect, risky, or misaligned.

Intentional Permissions

Agents can only act within the permissions they are granted.

Access should be limited to what is necessary and reviewed regularly. Excess permissions increase risk without increasing value.

Why Boundaries Matter

Without boundaries, agentic AI can:

amplify small mistakes quickly

act on vague or poorly defined goals

create compliance, security, or reputational risk

make errors harder to trace and reverse

Boundaries convert speed into reliability.

Responsibility Does Not Transfer

A critical principle of agentic AI is that accountability remains human.

If an agent produces an error, the responsibility lies with the person who defined the goal, approved the action, or failed to intervene.

Automation changes execution, not ownership.

Common Failure Mode

A common mistake is assuming that automation reduces oversight requirements.

In reality, agentic AI requires more intentional supervision, especially as systems become faster and more autonomous within their allowed scope.

Unchecked automation scales consequences.

The Conjugo Rule

Speed is permissioned. Control is mandatory.

Agentic AI should operate within clearly defined, reviewable boundaries at all times.

Best Practices

Safety boundaries work best when:

approvals are explicit and logged

permissions are minimal and reviewed

agents are monitored continuously

override mechanisms are always available

Well-designed constraints enable confident use.

Section Takeaway

Agentic AI increases execution power

Boundaries preserve human control

Permissions and approvals prevent misuse

Responsibility always remains human

Agentic AI is safe when intent and oversight are explicit.

End of Module 8

You have completed Module 8: Agentic AI — When AI Starts Taking Actions.

This module covered:

what agentic AI is

why it matters

how it appears in real workflows

how to maintain safety and control

The next module, Module 9: AI for Research — Without Getting Misled, focuses on fact-checking, sourcing, evaluating reliability, and avoiding confident-sounding errors.

This concludes Module 8.