Attachments
  • Mark as Completed
  • View
    12
  • More
Previous class
Section 3: What hallucinations look like

Section 4: How to double-check outputs

Module 7 — Data Safety & Common Mistakes

Section 4: How to Double-Check Outputs

Purpose of This Section

This section explains how to verify AI outputs efficiently and responsibly without eliminating the productivity benefits of using AI.

Double-checking is a discipline, not a slowdown.

The Core Idea

Verification should scale with risk.

Not every AI output requires the same level of scrutiny. The appropriate level of verification depends on what is at stake and who may be affected by an error.

Judgment determines where accuracy is mandatory and where speed is acceptable.

Why Double-Checking Matters

AI outputs can be fluent, confident, and wrong at the same time.

Unchecked errors can:

  • propagate across documents and teams
  • influence decisions based on incorrect information
  • create legal, financial, or reputational risk

Double-checking prevents small errors from becoming systemic problems.

When Verification Is Required

Extra verification is required when outputs involve:

  • financial decisions
  • policies or compliance
  • safety considerations
  • employment or personnel matters
  • externally shared information

As stakes increase, tolerance for error decreases.

Practical Ways to Double-Check

Double-checking does not require starting over.

Effective methods include:

  • confirming dates, names, and figures
  • reviewing cited sources directly
  • cross-checking against trusted references
  • asking the same question in a different way
  • having another person review high-impact outputs

Verification should be efficient and intentional.

Signals to Slow Down

Certain characteristics should trigger closer review:

  • answers that sound unusually polished or definitive
  • claims presented without sources
  • precise details in ambiguous or recent topics
  • conclusions that seem too clean or simple

These are indicators, not proof, of potential error.

Common Failure Mode

A common mistake is treating verification as an all-or-nothing task.

Some users skip verification entirely. Others over-verify everything and lose efficiency. Both approaches reduce effectiveness.

Balanced verification preserves speed while protecting accuracy.

The Conjugo Rule

Let risk determine rigor.

Use AI to accelerate thinking, but apply verification proportional to consequences.

Best Practices

Double-checking works best when:

  • verification standards are consistent
  • high-risk outputs are reviewed before use
  • responsibility remains clearly human
  • speed and caution are balanced intentionally

Discipline enables trust.

Section Takeaway

  • Not all outputs require the same scrutiny
  • Verification scales with stakes
  • AI accelerates work but does not ensure accuracy
  • Responsibility remains human

Double-checking is how speed and safety coexist.

End of Module 7

You have completed Module 7: Data Safety & Common Mistakes.

This module covered:

  • protecting sensitive documents
  • avoiding personal data exposure
  • recognizing hallucinations
  • building verification habits

The next module, Module 8: Agentic AI, explores what happens when AI moves from answering questions to executing multi-step tasks — and why oversight becomes even more critical.

This concludes Module 7.